Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 5:52 pm
Some of the classic cases, like Buchanan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
” Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:52 pm
” Marston v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
But the motion notes that--as this blog has also reported--the Munich Higher Regional Court will hear Conti's appeal on Halloween, and should the existing AAIIs be lifted, Conti will inform Judge Koh and will presumably seek an extension to those cases.The exclusion of those ten pending Nokia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Holder that discriminating against a person who has transitioned from one sex to the other or who assumes an appearance contrary to birth sex is a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:43 pm
However, her claims for interference under the FMLA and retaliation failed (Garrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:29 am
In a recent decision, Oxford University Bank v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
This term, the Court will hear argument from IJ's educational choice team in Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
EduCap, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
” Graham v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Facts: This case (Woods v. [read post]
