Search for: "State v. Jacobs" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
On April 20, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm by SOIssues
Since that decision, the US Supreme Court has only made one single ruling against any sex offender laws; the Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In the absence of such evidence Yelton J found in favour of Mr Bent.Lord Justice Jacob delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In the absence of such evidence Yelton J found in favour of Mr Bent.Lord Justice Jacob delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal ordered a retrial. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Former State Senator Hiram Monserrate lost his expedited appeal that challenges his expulsion from the Senate after he was convicted on a domestic violence offense.The case is Monserrate v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by charonqc
We British, sadly, are conditioned from birth to be feudally hierarchical, to make subtle distinctions of class, intelligence, tribe etc etc etc… we have State School v Public School, Oxbridge v Red Brick…. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:14 am by Steve Statsinger
United States v.Deandrade, No. 08-4815-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ashby Jones
From where we sit, the most interesting component of the most interesting Supreme Court case of the term — McDonald v. [read post]