Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:24 am
In NTPC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
" Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am
On 9 July, Clark was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Co., 185 F.R.D. at 578; see also London–Sire Records, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
IALS, London 22 June 2012, 10.30am-1pm: Changing the face of freedom, Free Word Centre, London. 28 June 2012, all day, LexisNexis Defamation & Privacy conference, London. 1-27 August, 5pm, Comedy: ‘One Rogue Reporter‘, Rich Peppiatt / Something for the Weekend, Edinburgh Festival. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
He considers that five authorities: Warner v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
He considers that five authorities: Warner v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
The AmeriKat's fantasy Brazilian island retreat,complete with patent decisions to keep oneoccupiedYet another gray, bleak Friday afternoon in London. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am
The appellants would have been better advised to state the facts relevant to their occupation of the property in their own words and to explain what they knew of the others who were not going to be called to give evidence. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:53 am
Mr Heffernan was the freehold owner of 16 Penhurst Road, London, E9 (”the property”). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
: The art and politics of a rupture (2016), London, Palgrave McMillian, Nash C. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
Also on Thursday 19 June 2014, the Court will hear the appeal of R (Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Cusson v Quan 2007 ONCA 771). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
(The ‘exceptional needs or circumstances’ reference is to Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7 (our note)). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
