Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:41 am
Jivraj v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
In Mr J Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited [2022] UKET 4102454/2020, Mr Kovalkovs, an Orthodox Christian, was a quality inspector in 2 Sisters Food Group’s chicken processing factory. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
An example of such a decision was given in Lord Justice Warrington in Short v Poole Corporation [1926] as ‘a red-haired teacher being dismissed because she had red hair’. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
FLAG -- meets next week on the evening of 18 March, in the House of Lords, London. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:24 am
Lord Stephens also considers the applicable legal framework. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Hughes. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am
Davies v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Scotch Whisky Association & Ors v the Lord Advocate & Anor (Scotland), heard 24-25 Jul 2017. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
To which extent may state authorities (in this case, the State of North Carolina) act as copyright pirates? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
As Lord Woolf said in the case of Jones v Warwick, the principle that evidence can be obtained in whichever way one likes, whether illegally or not, must be at least concerning to society as a whole: While this approach will help to achieve justice in a particular case, it will do nothing to promote the observance of the law by those engaged or about to be engaged in legal proceedings. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
In this respect, Lord Briggs commended the summary by Sales LJ in AAA v Unilever plc [2018] EWCA Civ 1532, para 36 (another challenge to jurisdiction on similar issues) that “A parent company will only be found to be subject to a duty of care in relation to an activity of its subsidiary if ordinary, general principles of the law of tort regarding the imposition of a duty of care on the part of the parent in favour of a claim are satisfied in the particular case”. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
Jonathan is currently an LLM Candidate at Penn State Law. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
