Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 1641 - 1660 of 13,668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am by Daphne Keller
The Israeli Supreme Court recently rejected a challenge to Israel’s version of this system, in a case called Adalah v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog had an article on the government’s response to the near-universal criticism of its Online Harms consultation. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 10:56 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Defense Attorney’s Interjection of Racial Stereotypes During Jury Selection Leads to Conviction Reversal In Dean v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:55 am by Gene Takagi
Special Operations counterterrorism mission overnight in northwestern Syria in which Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, the leader of the Islamic State militant group, was killed. [read post]
Albert Alberta, Michael Cooper, was interviewed at the rally and gave his support for the protestors. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
EPA Administrator Michael S. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
And a few hours before those filings, I was already impressed with the fact that "the Dean of American Antitrust Law" (as the New York Times called him), Professor Herbert Hovenkamp, signed a world-class amicus brief submitted by Professor Michael Carrier.The state attorneys-general ("state AGs") supporting Epic here are basically the ones suing Google alongside Epic in the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Her most recent book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (co-authored with Michael C. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“Faith Can’t Abrogate a Contract; A California state court goes too far in a ruling against Scientology’s arbitration agreement”: Law professor Michael J. [read post]