Search for: "State v. Price" Results 1641 - 1660 of 13,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
We are stuck in a perpetual state of betwixt and between, a kind of innovation limbo. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
We are stuck in a perpetual state of betwixt and between, a kind of innovation limbo. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am by Ana Popovich
UM also allegedly “caused JMH to bill additional false claims to Medicare by forcing them to use UM pre-transplant laboratory testing at inflated prices. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:55 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 12:11 pm by admin
The proposed amendments to the General Regulation would include the following: (i) prominently disclosing the registrant’s registered name in all advertising (section 12.1(1)); (ii) requiring a brokerage that identifies a broker or salesperson by name in an advertisement to use the name in which the broker or salesperson is registered (section 12.1(2)); (iii) clearly and prominently identifying the brokerage that employs the broker or salesperson (section 12.1(3)); (iv) using prescribed terms… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While the Public Health Law contains no provision allowing people to sue the medical provider for price gauging, the state can impose a civil penalty for these violations, up to $2,000 for each violation. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Allegations related to the healthcare company covertly controlling a distribution network that engaged in questionable pricing practices to boost sales. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]