Search for: "State v. Scales" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Weyhrauch case tests whether the law applies to a state official if that official did not violate any state law. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am by INFORRM
The last case awarding damages in this region was in 2013 where the false allegation of human trafficking was made by the Defendants (Al-Amoudi v Kifle and another [2013] EWHC 293 (QB)). [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm by Ilya Somin
Elsewhere, I have explained why Founding-era understandings of "invasion" are limited to large-scale armed attacks, and do not cover things like illegal migration or drug smuggling (for more detail, see my amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm by Ilya Somin
First, it is slightly incorrect to state that Kelo said that the “public purpose” test applies only to cases involving “a broad-scale urban development plan. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
The court followed a Colorado case in finding that a "large-scale inundation of water [is] a 'flood.'" See Kane v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
The court followed a Colorado case in finding that a "large-scale inundation of water [is] a 'flood.'" See Kane v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm by Seeger Weiss
From offices in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, the firm has represented over 10,000 individuals, organizations, and states and local municipalities across the U.S. that have been injured or defrauded on a massive scale. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm by Kalvis Golde
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]