Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 4:29 am by Walter Olson
[Brandon Murrill, William & Mary Law Review, PDF] Blonds not protected class under federal employment discrimination law, judge declares [six years ago on Overlawyered] Tags: alcohol, claims fraud, First Amendment, small business, Supreme Court Related posts “I’ve always thought people would be very concerned if they knew what we were doing” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:18 am
Commentators have offered numerous possible answers, but in CA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm by Walter Olson
In November I wrote in Jurist on a Third Circuit panel’s refusal to order that sports great Jim Thorpe be disinterred and reburied under provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); in response, Elizabeth Varner, Diane Penneys Edelman and Leila Amineddoleh of the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation argue that the panel could have based its result on specific language in the statute rather than via the roundabout path it did take… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:40 am by Dental Library
Recently, citric acid was used as a substitute for nitric acid in passivation of stainless steel. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Dave Hoffman] Walden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and other uses of… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm
Resource: Pannu v Land Rover North America, Inc. et. al, California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, January 19, 2011 [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:18 am by Walter Olson
” [Ken, Popehat] “Why Mitt Romney likes firing people” [Suzanne Lucas] Free speech and union dues: Tim Sandefur on the oral argument in Knox v. [read post]