Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 14,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
On April 22, the Court heard an extended — over seventy minutes long - argument in Ricci v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm by John D. Graham
” Twenty years later, in Whitman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
., tons of delay, even though the government theoretically has a strong interest in getting these cases resolved expeditiously. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 4:27 am by Steven Eversole
Supreme Court decision that widens the time limit for those who can show strong proof of their innocence. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
Thomas McCarthy discusses (here) the CAFC's ruling in the INSIGNIA case, Joseph Phelps Vineyards, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm
Our Birmingham criminal defense lawyers, who also handle post-conviction relief actions, including appeals and federal petitions for writs of habeas corpus, were pleased to hear the outcome of McQuiggin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:30 am by Ingrid Wuerth
In March, the government suggested immunity for former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe in the Giraldo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am by Marcia Coyle
“Before viability, the state’s interests are not strong enough to support a prohibition of abortion,” the court held in Casey. [read post]