Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2020, 2:06 am by Sullivan and Galleshaw
Los abogados de daño personal de Queens en Sullivan y Galleshaw representan a víctimas de lesión y sus familias y podrían ayudarle con su caso. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am by Will
But we have had a chance to review yesterday afternoon’s oral argument transcript in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Sullivan–the Alien Act remains a valid basis for the federal immigration power. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “” A claim for legal malpractice is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel'” (Schiff v Sallah Law Firm, P.C., 128 AD3d 668, 669, quoting Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083; see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action by tendering invoices for services rendered prior to December 5, 2006, setting forth his hourly rate, the billable hours expended, and the particular services rendered, and establishing that the defendant signed such invoices, failed to timely object to the invoices, and made partial payments thereon (see Landa v Dratch, 45 AD3d 646, 648; Landa v Sullivan, 255… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action by tendering invoices for services rendered prior to December 5, 2006, setting forth his hourly rate, the billable hours expended, and the particular services rendered, and establishing that the defendant signed such invoices, failed to timely object to the invoices, and made partial payments thereon (see Landa v Dratch, 45 AD3d 646, 648; Landa v Sullivan, 255… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
Reporting today on Tuesday's COA decision in the case of Dan Lockard v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Brasier, Detroit Free Press] Case against deference: “Now More Than Ever, Courts Should Police Administrative Agencies” [Ilya Shapiro on Perez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:48 am by Sarah Sutherland
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 Housen v. [read post]