Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am by Jeff Lazarus
Taylor was convicted in 2004 of crack cocaine offenses. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
  First, an infringement suit ended in an award of $5.8 million in damages for infringement of egg pasteurization techniques in the case of Michael Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
id=1497436 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of MontanaSK Rossi, Owner, Central House Strategies Gary Mitchell, AttorneySession Moderator: James Taylor, Managing Attorney, Tribal Prosecutors… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:36 pm by B.W. Barnett
Earlier this month, the 11th District Court of Appeals (Eastland) applied the “Tulia Law” in Taylor v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:15 am by jbyrne
 Last week, Sovereign Bank responded with a legal malpractice action in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, which alleges errors by Stradley in creating $200 million in loans to subprime lender Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]