Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
Facts T was an Assured Shorthold Tenant of a property. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
Reviewing pertinent federal precedent, particularly SEC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 7:20 am
In this particular case, Boston Housing Authority v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:33 am
Second, there is a tension between the principle against doubtful penalisation which states that a penalty should not be applied where the underlying legislation lacks certainty and the public policy objective of protecting tenants. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:33 am
Second, there is a tension between the principle against doubtful penalisation which states that a penalty should not be applied where the underlying legislation lacks certainty and the public policy objective of protecting tenants. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Illinois is apparently unique among the states in allowing condominium boards to file actions under the state Forcible Entry Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:46 am
Estate of Saylor, et al, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Still, the precedent is likely to prove influential in other states as well, since the case deals with having guns for self-defense, which D.C. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Secretary of State for Home Department v MN & KY, heard 5 March 2014. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
To claim from a member of the tenant's household or the tenant's visitor. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm
Falls Road Community Ass’n, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Martinez, et al v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
The question at issue is whether a defendant must be physically present to successfully object when a co-tenant gives permission to police officers to conduct a warrantless search, or whether the defendant’s previously stated objection to a warrantless search, while physically present, is a continuing assertion of Fourth Amendment rights that cannot later be overriden by the co-tenant. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
The question at issue is whether a defendant must be physically present to successfully object when a co-tenant gives permission to police officers to conduct a warrantless search, or whether the defendant’s previously stated objection to a warrantless search, while physically present, is a continuing assertion of Fourth Amendment rights that cannot later be overriden by the co-tenant. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:02 am
In 366-386 Street LP v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
