Search for: "US v. David May"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 7,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
It suggests that some arms prohibitions and regulations may be valid, but bans on modern semiautomatic rifles and magazines are not. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
No prior case stands for the proposition that Congress may use the interstate commerce power to order persons to buy a particular product, or may use the tax power to punish people for choosing not to purchase a particular product. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
(See, e.g., AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:01 am
In Really Virtual Co Ltd v UK Intellectual Property Office [2012] EWHC 1086 (Ch), John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Patents Court, England and Wales, on 2 May. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:45 pm
Guggenheim v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
Premium Brands Operating Limited Partnership v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
John Fund, et al., v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:57 am
Many have not seen the need for this and as a result, there may be many families using traditional beneficiary designations which place their retirement funds at risk. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:50 am
By William David and Laura J. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
” It is true that he uses the word “assumption”—which reminds us that the Court assumed but did not decide the government’s interest was compelling. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
’”[7] Therefore, new case law will be impactful, given the present lack of specific laws about how AI capabilities may permissibly interface with copyrightable data such as visual images and artworks. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
(Editor’s Note: The article below, just published in The Deal, came to us from its author David Marcus.) [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
David M. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
In 2010, police officers discovered David Rezendes sitting behind the wheel of a parked car in Larimer County, Colorado. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Dana, David. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am
Cody summarized the February 16 session, Yishai Schwartz covered the February 17 session, David Ryan outlined the February 18 session, and Francesca Procaccini caught us up on the February 22 session. [read post]
