Search for: "United States, Appeal of" Results 1641 - 1660 of 58,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 5:48 pm
United States, today Judge Kozinski makes clear that "failing to name an appellee in an NOA is not a bar to an appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:02 am
  If you have not been to his Iowa State University site, visit.Earlier posts on the Criminal Justice Integrity Unit, formed by Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Barbara Hervey, are here. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:09 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The United States Court of Appeals concluded there was no basis for ALJ’s findings, and any basis that might exist was not explained by ALJ as required. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:36 am by Berniard Law Firm
A recent United States Court of Appeals ruling for the Fifth Circuit highlights the complexities of establishing personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state employer in a lawsuit filed in Louisiana. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:56 am
A taxpayer has 30 days within which to file a formal Direct Appeal and 90 days within which to petition the United States Tax Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:28 am by admin
How do you state the issues that you want to raise on appeal? [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am by jonathanturley
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has blocked border enforcement by the state under Texas’s SB 4. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:04 am by Rick Davis & Associates
The United States and Texas Constitutions both afford protection against double jeopardy, which means a person cannot be tried more than once for the same crime. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by Adam Wagner
The European Court of Human Rights has rejected the United Kingdom’s application to appeal its decision in a recent finding that stop and search powers enacted as part of anti-terrorism legislation breached human rights law. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm by Derek Dissinger
Last week, I argued on behalf of a taxpayer in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia against the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:29 pm
§ 101.106(f) (Vernon 2005).The Court of Appeals would not leave the plaintiff without a remedy. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:30 am by David M. McLain
  The Court of Appeals rejected this argument, reasoning that other provisions of section 217 contemplate consent requirements by parties other than unit owners, such as first mortgagees. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:30 am by David M. McLain
  The Court of Appeals rejected this argument, reasoning that other provisions of section 217 contemplate consent requirements by parties other than unit owners, such as first mortgagees. [read post]