Search for: "United States v. Age"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 7,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit has entered an order granting the unopposed motion of the United States for leave to file an amicus brief in PHH by March 17, 2017. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Third, the practice of all states for several decades has been to use persons, not voters (whether voting-age population, citizen voting-age population, or eligible voters) as the redistricting metric. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am
Reading the Second Circuit’s affirmance of District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s suppression ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 3:30 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 628 (1935). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
However, once a child reaches the age of 21, the law states that he/she has “aged-out” and cannot immigrate together with the rest of the family. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:23 pm
So far, lower courts have disagreed with him, most recently in State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled a plaintiff waived his right to arbitration by substantially engaging in litigation. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
If a religion calls someone a “minister,” they avoid court, whether they have discriminated against the employee on the basis of race, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, or health status, or for their whistleblowing against the employer’s misconduct. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its opinion in Moore v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm
That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:29 am
In the case, OBB Personenverkehr AG (OBB) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
: The Role of Barnette in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
