Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
Colombia’s conviction in absentia In 1998, Yair Klein was officially indicted in Colombia on charges of training paramilitary units in terror tactics during the late 1980’s. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
Participation in the Colombian armed conflict In the mid 1980’s, the retired Israeli army officer focused his interest on the bloody war taking place between the Colombian state and drug trafficking cartels. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
(credit for NASA drawing above of GPS satellite)In the case under review, Antoine Jones, a nightclub owner in Washington DC, had been convicted of drugs offences. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Sanade, Harrison & Walker v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 00048(IAC) – Read judgment. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am by Rosalind English
The Soil Association formally objected to the plans because of the ‘increased disease risk and poor welfare conditions” of intensive units. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
  The would-be class consisted of:all other persons similarly situated, throughout the United States, who are domociled [sic] in one of the fifty states, including Ohio, and who are consumers who received ANY vaccine or drug with a PharmaJet injector device where the specific vaccine or specific drug does not have the stated approval by the FDA for administration with a “needleless injector” or “needle-free injector,”… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Section 1441 provides generally that civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” may be removed. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Ken
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
§ 273(c) states that commercial use includes FDA reviews of drug applications, as well as non-commercial use in “nonprofit” or university laboratory “for which the public is the intended beneficiary. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:10 am by WSLL
The passenger was identified as the appellant.The appellant filed a motion to suppress evidence, claiming he was seized by the detectives in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution and article 1 section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:02 am by Krekor
” The case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
All of these actions constituted violations of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, making many of Ranbaxy’s drugs adulterated, potentially unsafe and illegal to sell in the United States. [read post]