Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
  Here's the relevant language of the MCA: No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm by Barry Sookman
Justice Smith rejected Google’s arguments that the Canadian order violated its First Amendment rights or the core values of the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Center at Santa Clara University in the United States, questions that approach to regulating the Internet. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:54 am by Lissa Griffin
United States, in 2009, the court narrowly applied Ashe, and never held a second trial barred by collateral estoppel. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 pm
Brunswick Corp.: Motion to Dismiss [PDF] Related: Business - United States - Consumer Goods and Services - Miami - Services [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Howard Knopf
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:58 pm by joel
The petitioners submitted a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States in March of 2012, but it was denied. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
The relationship between EU law and the municipal law of the United Kingdom seems to lend itself to allusions to water. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm by William McGeveran
This morning the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision (PDF here) in a strange case that many privacy scholars had watched closely, Sorell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am by Kristin Johnson
And, at the core of this case, “…the right to convey core political messages on trademarks” as stated by Elster’s counsel Jon Taylor. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am by Frank Cranmer
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am by jonathanturley
It is considered one of the core cases defining free speech in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm by pfriedman
Roberts became chief justice of the United States, he said that he hoped to emulate the modesty and unanimity of his greatest predecessor, John Marshall. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
That has left public-sector unions, representing 35.7% of government workers, to carry the lead banner for organized labor across the United States. [read post]