Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
It points out that 83 MEPs from the 6 largest parliamentary groups and from 18 different member states have signed up to the 10 point “WePromiseEU” Charter. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
 This not what happened in Adobe Systems Incorporated v Netcom Online.Co.UK Ltd & Another [2012] EWHC 446 (Ch), 2 March 2012, a decision of Mr Justice Warren (Chancery Division, England and Wales), concerning a consent agreement that become not so much the end of an old dispute as the beginning of a new one. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 am
"Desertpeace - http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/ News From Underground: FOIA filed for OPR report on torture lawyersBy mcm "Founded in September 2008, the RJSC works to bring about the criminal prosecution of top government officials in the United States alleged to have committed war crimes. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:58 am
This contention has met with varying degrees of success in the United States and England, but has been accepted on occasion in France. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:30 am
This point recently came before Judge Birss QC in the (still misnamed) Patents County Court for England and Wales in relation to whether a substantial part of a book was reproduced in a film script: Hodgson and Jarvie v Isaac and Notting Hill Movies Ltd (2011). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 This issue includes a special dedication to the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Paul R. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
Enka objected to these Russian proceedings claiming that under the terms of its contract of engagement any such dispute was to be arbitrated via the ICC in England: in September 2019, it sought declaratory orders from the English High Court that the matter should be arbitrated in England, that the applicable law of the arbitration agreement was English, and requested an English anti-suit injunction to restrain Chubb from continuing the Russian litigation. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a challenge brought by young people against the federal government’s handling of climate change going back to … well, the Space Age. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
  As the Master of Rolls stated on the launch of the 2022 Blockchain Legal & Regulatory Guidance[8]: “every lawyer will require familiarity with the blockchain, smart legal contracts and cryptoassets. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by INFORRM
There is a world of difference between illustrating how a powerful country like the United States conducts its diplomacy and a News of the World reporter seeking royal tittle-tattle. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
Although the European Court of Human Rights has held that the rule does not in itself violate Article 10 (Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v United Kingdom (Apps Nos 3002/03 and 23676/03) [2009] EMLR 254), it is clear that it can have an onerous impact upon newspapers and other online publishers. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm by Lawrence Higgins
Maybe the End of Times, for False Marking Suits Under the America Invents Act, "Only the United States may sue for statutory damages. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The pilot scheme allowing journalists to report on cases at family courts in England and Wales has been expanded to include private law. [read post]