Search for: "United States v. Felt" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am by Rumpole
United States, 674 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2011).You tell em Judge Hill. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm by Rosalind English
This judgment may not address the disquiet felt by some about the irreversibility of a life sentence, expressed by Laws LJ in R (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] … a prisoner’s incarceration without hope of release is in many respects in like case to a sentence of death. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:53 am by Florian Mueller
In June, Judge Richard Posner, sitting by designation on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, also canceled a trial shortly before it was supposed to begin.The Wisconsin situation has no bearing on the Microsoft v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am by Ronald Mann
Moments after Joshua Rosenkranz (arguing for Kirtsaeng) started to present his argument, Justice Ginsburg stopped him to express her concern that the regime he proposed (“universal exhaustion,” as she termed it) would have the United States giving more limited rights to copyright owners than any other country in the world. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
But Motorola doesn't want this to happen in the United States, and especially not in a way that takes care of the FRAND licensing question on a worldwide basis.Motorola's Wisconsin motion wasn't sealed, but Apple's response, filed on Friday at Judge Crabb's request, is inaccessible to the public. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:49 pm
That was the reasoning behind the district court’s decision to exclude evidence in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by Sean Hanover
Petitioner “turned his back” on the gang as a requisite for coming to the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am by Ryan Flax
  It is my sincere belief that if you polled patent attorneys in the United States, you’d find that 9 out of 10 feel (or, if they closely followed the Apple case – felt) that design patents were a bit of a joke. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am by Florian Mueller
The first injunction doesn't matter anymore because Motorola recently felt forced to accept an offer by Apple (which is not even based on a particular amount of money since the royalty rate will have to be set by a court of law) for taking a license to Motorola's wireless SEPs. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:13 pm by David Jacobson
I think all of his explanations came back to a view on his part that the Bank was not genuine in stating that it wished to redeploy him. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
This aspect of the plain view doctrine was discussed in a series of United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Onion has a story that begins: WASHINGTON—The justices of the United States Supreme Court confirmed this week that although he has been on the job less than a year, their new agent, Rory McCleft, has already started to help the nine-member panel land more high-profile cases. [read post]