Search for: "United States v. Provident National Bank"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on June 11, 1907. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
AT&T, 131 S.Ct. at 1746 (quoting Discover Bank v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
More specifically, if the plan is governed by ERISA, the United States Code at 29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am
The defendants’ argument was based on the language of Section 22 of the ’33 Act, as amended by SLUSA, which provides in pertinent part: The district courts of the United States and the United States courts of any Territory shall have jurisdiction of offenses and violations under this title and under the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission in respect thereto, and, concurrent with State and Territorial courts,… [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on May 19, 1937. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:00 am
To this end, the defendants, assisted by others in the United States and Pakistan, conspired to provide and provided material support to the Pakistani Taliban by soliciting, collecting and transferring money from the United States to supporters of the Pakistani Taliban, primarily using bank accounts and wire transfer services in the United States and Pakistan. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on August 30, 1939. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Mitchell v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:12 am
Presumably, this is allowed under Regulation B because the rules state that a bank must only consider nontraditional data when evaluating “similarly qualified applicants. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
Also, the filing of a financing statement is “not necessary or effective” to perfect a security interest in personal property subject to a “statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States” which provides a national filing system for the perfection of security interests. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:01 pm
National Australia Bank). [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
S957aCivil rights -- Search and seizure -- Excessive force -- Because 42 U.S.C. section 1983 is silent or “deficient” with respect to survival of a civil rights action in favor of another upon death of injured party, Section 1988(a) requires application of state survivorship law, provided that state law is “not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States” -- Alabama survivorship statute, which provides… [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 3 provides that surrender may be refused on the grounds that the person sought is a national of the requested State, but that each party’s Executive Authority–in the case of the United States, the Secretary of State–shall have the power to extradite its nationals, unless prohibited by its domestic legislation, if, in its discretion, it deems it appropriate to do so. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 1, 1909. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
The fabrication of counterfeit money, whether coin or paper, counterfeit titles or coupons of public debt, created by National, State, Provincial, Territorial, Local or Municipal Governments, bank notes or other instruments of public credit, counterfeit seals, stamps, dies and marks of State or public administrations, and the utterance, circulation or fraudulent use of the above mentioned objects. 15. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:37 am
” Justice Scalia’s majority opinion held that this preempts California’s unconscionability rule applied in Discover Bank v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
Concepcion There has long been talk of the pr0-business conservative majority that currently comprises the United State’s Supreme Court. [read post]
