Search for: "V D" Results 1641 - 1660 of 76,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 2:09 am by sally
Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) v CRC Credit Fund Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 3228 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 371 “The statutory trust created by Chap 7 of the Clients Assets Sourcebook (‘CASS 7?) [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:41 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (3) [2008] EWHC 2519 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 323 “In the light of the stance taken by the US government that it would reconsider the intelligence relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom if the court were to make the order sought by the claimant, the appropriate course was to stay proceedings until after the outcome of the forthcoming hearing in the US Federal District Court,… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am by sally
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making determinations of… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:54 am by sally
Kellogg Brown & Root Holdings (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWCA Civ 118; [2010] WLR (D) 53 “For the purposes of capital gains tax in relation to associated companies, under s 286(5)(b) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992, a ‘group’ did not require any common purpose but was to be given its ordinary meaning of ‘collection’. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:35 am by sally
Debt Collect London Ltd and another v SK Slavia Praha-fotbal AS [2010] EWCA Civ 1250; [2010] WLR (D) 281 “The proviso in art 30.1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the Judgments Regulation) disapplied the general rule that the court was deemed to be seised of proceedings when they were lodged. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 am by sally
Regina v S; Regina v H [2011] EWCA Crim 2872; [2011] WLR (D) 363 “Section 46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 was not incompatible with articles 6 and 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by reason of being too vague and uncertain. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:12 am by tracey
Mahamdia v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: (Case C-154/11);  [2012] WLR (D)  218 “An embassy situated in a member state of the European Union was an ‘establishment’ within the meaning of article 18(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in the context of a dispute concerning a contract of employment concluded by the embassy on behalf of the sending state, where the functions carried out by the employee did not fall within… [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm by Joe Mullin
That's money we'd rather spend on great new products for people to use.Read more | Comments [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:19 am by Unreported Opinions
Williams’ right leg, which had been injured in a motor […] The post TERENCE WILLIAMS v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:42 am
Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13; WLR (D) 62 “Where the deceased's suicide had been the direct result of a depressive illness from which he had been suffering, which had been the direct and foreseeable consequence of an accident for which his employer was liable, his widow was entitled to claim damages under s 1 of the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
The D&O Policy in question provides four layers of coverage—a total of $50 million. [read post]