Search for: "VI" Results 1641 - 1660 of 13,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 11:01 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:52 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:19 am by Paul S.O. Barbeau
Digital asset platform Anchorage helped Vis acquire CryptoPunk7610. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm by Aarthi Anand
While there is significant attention being paid to whether an NFT would fall within the SEC’s purview, the implications and impact of NFT vis-à-vis copyright law has largely been ignored. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:44 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
Subsequently, entry 321in Annex III was introduced and additional provisions in existing entries 143 of Annex IV and 27 and 27a of Annex VI were added that further restricted the use of titanium dioxide in cosmetic products. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Draft No. 1) [hereinafter cited as Restatement]. [9] Restatement at iv (listing the reporters). [10] See id. at v-vi (listing advisers). [11] See id. at vii-viii (listing members). [12] “‘Sunk costs’ . . . are costs that have already been incurred and do not vary with one’s subsequent actions. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:01 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
Pursues Curbs on Outbound Investment and Chip Technology Sales to China U.S. lawmakers and the Biden administration are looking to expand their arsenal of tools to boost U.S. competitiveness vis-a-vis China as the broader chips bill remains in limbo. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:06 am by Becky
 vi)         More generally, the Decision would have the effect that no, or almost no, Libertel form mark would ever be valid. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The complaint alleges that during the class period the defendants misled investors by failing to disclose that: “(i) ensovibep was less effective at treating COVID-19 than Defendants had led investors to believe; (ii) accordingly, the FDA was reasonably likely to require an additional Phase 3 study of ensovibep before granting the drug EUA; (iii) waning global rates of COVID-19 significantly reduced the Company’s chances of securing EUA for ensovibep; (iv) as a product candidate,… [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Article VI, § 22 (h) of our Constitution provides that a Judge "removed by the court of appeals shall be ineligible to hold other judicial office. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:14 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:12 am by Urooba Abid
While the facts of this case concerned disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act and the ACA, its ruling also applies to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting race discrimination) and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (prohibiting sex discrimination). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:35 pm by Samuel Bray
., relief that goes beyond the parties to the case, not just incidentally, but because the court is purporting to control the actions of the defendant vis-a-vis the world). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am by Ralf Michaels
She understands populism not as an ideology but as a method for the demarcation and devaluation of all things “international” vis-à-vis what is deemed national. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:09 am by Kirsten B. Mooney
In contrast, Barrows produced a single affidavit swearing that she had never: (i) completed any electronic paperwork for Brinker or its predecessor, (ii) used any of Brinker’s computers to sign onboarding documents while at Chili’s, (iii) accessed Chili’s website, electronic system, or intranet site, (iv) heard of the electronic system used by Brinker during its onboarding process, (v) saw or signed the arbitration agreement, (vi) received or signed any document showing… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 7:49 am by Mikolaj Barczentewicz
In particular, in the criminal field, the requirement of independence entails that the said authority, first, should not be involved in the conduct of the criminal investigation in question and, secondly, must have a neutral stance vis-a-vis the parties to the criminal proceedings …The CJEU decided that PIUs do not satisfy this requirement of independence and, as such, cannot decide on government access to the retained data. [read post]