Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells" Results 1661 - 1680 of 4,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and defendant's commission thereof (CPL 100.15[3] & 100.40[1]; see People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; see also People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]). [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Union of India challenged the award u/s 34 of the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act), which was dismissed as Part I, including S. 34, was not applicable since the place of arbitration was Kuala Lumpur. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:18 am by Marcus Mintz and Emily Kesler
Smith, 2016 IL App (3d) 150516-U (3d Dist. 2016), a customer non-solicit covenant prohibited the employee from soliciting customers whom he serviced, as well as any customers of the employer regardless of whether the employee serviced the customers. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
In addition, APPA recommended in our comments an administrative mechanism for providing additional compliance time using the Title V permitting program that we believe is within U. [read post]