Search for: "**u.s. v. Davis"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
In United States v Davis, 726 F3d 357 [2nd Cir 2013], defendant was federally charged with assaulting another inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which the government alleged was “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” an element of that offense. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
(“Gemalto”) is the owner of U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
Today in Jones v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:11 am
Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475-76 (U.S. 1985) (internal quotations marks and citations omitted). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:29 am
Davis, 427 F.3d 197, 212 n.14 (3rd Cir.2005) (“[V]ideotaping or photographing the police in the performance of their duties on public property may be protected activit[ies]”); Smith v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:05 pm
In Concepcion, the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
See Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
It was about her husband, Wayne Davis, they said. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am
” Kristina Davis of U-T San Diego reports on the effect that the Court’s recent decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
From the largest U.S. refinery in Port Arthur to the storied Permian Basin in West Texas, Big Oil is back. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am
(Tamar Davis Larsen, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
” Davis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
: Congress v. the Supreme Court Damon Root, Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
Halbig v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
Charlesworth, U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006), and State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[Yes]Lack of Bona Fide Intent:Precedential No. 13: Lack of Bona Fide Intent Dooms Two "FUTURE" Applications, Says TTABOwnership: Precedential No. 16: TTAB Orders Cancellation of Registration - Applicant not Owner of Underlying Foreign RegistrationSpecimen of Use: Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability On These Two Mutilation Cases Non-use:Affirming Refusal, TTAB Says "HOURS OF ENERGY NOW" Not Being Used as a TrademarkCancellation Under Section 14(3):Precedential No. 19: TTAB Grants… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
On June 25, 2014, U.S. [read post]
