Search for: "APPEAL OF GRAHAM" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 2:34 pm
Supreme Court is going to be considering two cases this year (Graham v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm
President, Be The Advocate Your Mother Needed Dems to air sad health care stories to push Obama plan First Lady Promotes Local Health Clinic Graham: ‘Government-Run’ Health Care Won’t Pass Senate Michael Jackson death dominates the news Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:51 pm
  In Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
The factual inquiries relevant to obviousness are set forth in Graham v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
 Graham County appealed to the Supreme Court and won its first case there, in a set-back for whistleblowers everywhere. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
The case will be argued in October: it is Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am by LaBovick Law
"The court of appeals correctly construed the second clause of the “public disclosure” bar contained in 31 U.S.C. 3730(e)(4)(A). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Solicitor General in agreeing to hear Graham County Soil & Water, et al., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Regina v Horncastle; Regina v Blackmore; Regina v Marquis; Regina v Graham; Regina v Carter Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A criminal trial could be fair although the defence did not have the opportunity of examining every prosecution witness. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 10:32 am
In other words, the Graham County Board of Education takes the position that because it can violate to an otherwise intolerable degree the privacy of its students, it can do the same to the adults. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:55 pm
Altana Pharma AG and Wyeth went crying to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Federal Circuit said "too bad. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:38 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 19, 2009 ... motion to suppress because the factual basis of the plea colloquy supported a finding that Defendant possessed the firearm in furtherance of a drug crime; and 2) did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea. ... [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:19 am
Lee. [5] Four men were convicted and drew hefty sentences that the Court of Appeals upheld. [6]The Court of Appeals repeatedly referred to the technique as "torture. [read post]