Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Karen Tani
But like the film Waiting for Superman before it, Class Warfare is highly misleading and often simplistic.For other reviews, see our earlier round-ups, here and here.Over at the Los Angeles Times, you'll find coverage of Hughes After Howard (Sea Hills Press), an insider's account of Hughes Aircraft Co. after the departure of its eccentric founder. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:17 am by Steve Hall
Baker, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces1:20 p.m. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am by INFORRM
  The first was with Hugh Grant at the Lib Dem conference on Sunday 18 September 2011. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Court of Appeals rejected the argument. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Court of Appeals rejected the argument. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court will hear the appeal in Flood v Times Newspapers on 17 and 18 October 2001. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Both the government and DuPont appealed: the court resolved the government's appeal in this opinion and DuPont's appeal in a memorandum disposition filed simultaneously with this opinion. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:19 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hughes v The Corps of Commissionaires Management Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1061 (08 September 2011) Camertown Timber Merchants Ltd & Anor v Sidhu & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1041 (08 September 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Castle & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 2317 (Admin) (08 September 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
  The appeal was also comprehensively dismissed. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm by admin
Hughes (05-10-00481-CV) – Recites well-established standard for reviewing traditional summary judgment. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  The Judge refused to dismiss the claim on the basis of qualified immunity and the Court of Appeals dismissed the police appeal holding that Glik was exercising clearly-established First Amendment rights in filiming the officers in a public space, and that his clearly-established Fourth Amendment rights were violated by his arrest without probable cause. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
  In the case of Glik v Cunniffe (26 August 2011) the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Jeff Gamso
Hughes (C.A. 5, 1976), 542 F. 2d 246, 248. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:55 pm by David
In an 11-page ruling, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Hugh E. [read post]