Search for: "B. Smith" Results 1661 - 1680 of 5,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by Jon Sands
Doe, No. 11-10067 (1-31-13)(Smith (DJ DRI) with Fernandez and Berzon)This is an interesting opinion, explaining Dixon v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:18 am by Mark Astarita
  He agreed to a penny stock bar and a 10-year officer-and-director bar.The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Tracy Sivitz of the Microcap Fraud Task Force and Douglas Smith, David Stoelting, and Sandeep Satwalekar. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:39 am by Jon L. Gelman
Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Feeny Funeral Home, LLC (082836) Does the New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act -- which declares that "nothing" in the Compassionate Use Act “require[s]” an employer to accommodate a medical marijuana user, N.J.S.A. 24:6I-14 -- preclude a claim by an employee against an employer based on, among other things, the Law Against Discrimination? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:49 am by Debra A. McCurdy
As discussed in greater detail in the May 2012 Reed Smith LLP Client Alert, since October 1, 2012, CMS has utilized the HRRP in an effort to reduce hospital readmissions after discharge of patients with certain conditions. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
UPNC d/b/a The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, No. 971 WDA 2015 (Pa. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Ben Smith may think this was the golden age of blogging. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Jascob
The firm agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any future violations of Rule 203(b) of Reg. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
First, citing LLC Law § 701 (b), Justice Platkin determined that: the mere withdrawal of Smith and Dominelli did not operate to dissolve FSL or deprive it of the status of an operating entity. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:30 am by Russell Jackson
  The district court had dismissed the RICO count for the Smiths' failure to plead wire or mail fraud with the particularity required by Rule 9(b). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But that’s crazy b/c they forgot the reversal. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
  Regardless of how much the would-be class’ claims might actually be worth, those claims will be decapitated, so that they cannot recover the minimum CAFA jurisdictional amount, which is $5 million.The Supreme Court freed the hostages, holding, in accordance with Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Short Answer The Court of Chancery reasoned that collateral estoppel would not apply, and motions to dismiss based on Rule 23.1 and Rule 12(b)(6) were both denied. [read post]