Search for: "BLACK v. MAY."
Results 1661 - 1680
of 7,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2009, 3:28 am
In R. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:25 am
Research In Motion Limited v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
Is a writer who doesn't like blacks, or whites, or Catholics, or maybe Muslims and writes about it terrorising them? [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
Is a writer who doesn't like blacks, or whites, or Catholics, or maybe Muslims and writes about it terrorising them? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
In addition, summary judgment dismissing all of the causes of action and cross claims for contribution must be awarded to the Hager defendants because HDW settled the legal malpractice claim, and the remaining grounds for seeking contribution, as set forth in the pleadings, are no longer viable (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 736; Crimi v Black, 219 AD2d 610, 611). [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
" The Circuit cites Adams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Yesterday’s post was at pains to show how the Supreme Court, in Yee v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Gordon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Camper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:17 pm
But this confusion itself may be a strategy for a president on the brink of losing office, Black warns. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:05 am
Watkins Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:42 pm
General Rule The Supreme Court held in Hormel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Eleonora tells all.* Le rouge et le noir: when colour hits the IP headlinesJeremy pens this post on red roses and black cabs. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
He cites the definition of the word `pending’ in Black's Law Dictionary, which is `remaining undecided; awaiting decision . [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:59 pm
His dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
ShareIn 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
Instead of explicitly targeting blacks, they could target people who live in majority-black neighborhoods. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court in the UK has given its decision in the conjoined cases of Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, concerning indirect discrimination. [read post]
