Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
After all, unlike the Guantánamo cases, these are cases that started somewhere in the United States—and that directly affect those who live here, even if not you or I. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
Branch (In re Bank of New Engl. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
Branch (In re Bank of New Engl. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
The other justices united around that view. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
According to the court (pages 20-21), the reason is that the Detention Treatment Act of 2005 declares that the term "United States," "when used in a geographic sense . . . does not include the United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:32 am
Circuit Court of Appeals and chair of the Judicial Conference of the United States' budget committee. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
Why aren’t all three branches called upon to address these issues? [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:53 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bonehead Brands, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
The case is called Lebron v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 12:12 pm
The case is called Lebron v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm
The ACLU will push a Harris administration to rein in uses of surveillance that discriminate against people in the United States or invade their privacy. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
United States, 490 U. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am
“This frivolous lawsuit caused unnecessary distraction of our executive branch leaders during a sensitive national security crisis. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Looking beyond India, the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v Casey[9] had, while examining a plea for reconsideration of Roe v Wade[10], had presented before itself the following questions: a) whether the central rule had been found unworkable; b) whether the rule could be removed without serious inequity to those who had relied upon it; c) whether thecentral rule had become a doctrinal anachronism; and… [read post]
