Search for: "Bush v. United States" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm by Deborah Darin
  But, he also asked the United States Supreme Court to decide the NSA surveillance issue, citing a “looming gulf” between the facts in Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
Instead, we call on the United States government to live up to its expressed commitment to women’s rights through peaceful means. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Davis served as special counsel to President Bill Clinton, who offers a testimonial on Davis’s (somewhat barebones) website, and Boies represented Al Gore in Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
Illinois 13-5967Issue: Whether a defendant is acquitted for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where a court grants a motion for directed verdict after the prosecution refuses to present any evidence at trial to the empaneled and sworn jury. [read post]