Search for: "CARTER v. STATE" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Marcus Carter and Ben Egliston consider whether this is a genuine bid to set the company on course for the future of computing, or merely a PR exercise, for Inforrm this week. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
  Illinois courts decided that an award for pain and suffering is appropriate when there is evidence of physical injury, as was established in Carter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Peter M. Shane
Carter, in which the Court refused to say whether the Constitution required presidents to get any form of congressional consent to withdraw the United States from a treaty that the Senate had ratified. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
  Illinois courts decided that an award for pain and suffering is appropriate when there is evidence of physical injury, as was established in Carter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:37 am by SHG
  Take CNN, for example, who provided a bully pulpit to George Washington Professor Amitai Etzioni to opine about the constitutionality of GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
  Illinois courts decided that an award for pain and suffering is appropriate when there is evidence of physical injury, as was established in Carter v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am by Sam Hasler
Mattel Inc. , a case pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Mattel, maker of the Barbie doll, asserted that a former employee, Carter Bryant, began drawing designs for the Bratz doll - made by his new employer MGA Entertainment ("MGA") - while he was still employed by Mattel. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Lucinda Chaplin and William Carter, Lexology: Gender Identity v Gender Beliefs. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Geniune use in one member state is enough to maintain a community TM. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Carter, No. 06-2412 In a prosecution for extortion under the Hobbs Act, defen [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by axd10
Casenote: The Work Made for Hire Exception to the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (vara): Carter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 3, 2009)Denial of state unemployment no bar to federal ADEA retaliation claim Carter v. [read post]