Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 7,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
See Miller, 335 F.3d at 899; United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:53 am
The idea that an alleged victim may offer some assistance in a defendant’s criminal case in exchange for a favorable civil settlement is also reflected in 98 FEO 19 (stating that a victim’s attorney ethically may “propos[e] that [a] [v]ictim will acquiesce to [a favorable] plea agreement in exchange for a confession of judgment from [a defendant]”). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 12:37 pm
For example, the United States Supreme Court’s relatively recent ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
In Chicago v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Dunn won in State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:25 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:23 pm
In the November 6, 2019, case of Cooper v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
Hunter also links to a San Francisco Chronicle article.10/14/09 LawDork, by attorney Chris Geidner:Walker stated that neither Romer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
Insurer denied coverage of both claims stating that while both claims were covered by the policy, and that suits were filed against Insured within the Policy Period, Insurer did not receive notice of the suits until after the ninety-day notice requirement, and therefore was not obligated under the policy.Insured filed a complaint and a motion for summary judgment in the Circuit Court alleging that Insurer breached the Policy by denying the claims. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
The law does not require [petitioner] to challenge his conviction at the earliest opportunity, it only requires [petitioner] to have sound reasons for not doing so" (quoting United States v. [read post]
