Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 29,130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 8:55 am
Robyn Powell (University of Oklahoma - College of Law; Brandeis University - The Heller School for Social Policy and Management) has posted Under the Watchful Eye of All: Disabled Parents and the Family Policing System’s Web of Surveillance (112 California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:03 am
The post What Impact Will California’s New ‘Transaction Review’ Law Have? [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
California: The California Supreme Court holds that an employer's business entity agents can be held liable for employment discrimination under the state Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
This year’s review is set out below. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Sediqe, Unveiling: The Law of Gendered Islamophobia,111 California Law Review 465-527 (2023).Patricia McGuire, Title IX and Catholic Colleges' Long March into Modernity, [Abstract], 56 Creighton Law Review 341-358 (2023).Pooja R. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 10:35 am
(Connie Matthiessen, Inside Philanthropy) Reading List: Leading Through Change (Stanford Social Innovation Review) [Ed. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
First, postulate the following set of events and actions: Ben visited Point Magu State Beach in Ventura County, California between the hours of 12:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on Sunday, February 14, 2004. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 5:16 pm
” - Jennie Kil, San Francisco, California Read More Reviews SCHEDULE CONSULTATION Zoom Consultations Available! [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm
” - Jennie Kil, San Francisco, California Read More Reviews SCHEDULE CONSULTATION Zoom Consultations Available! [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:45 pm
The post How To Conduct Employee Terminations To Reduce Potential Liability appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 1, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of August 25-31, 2023. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, September 1, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of August 25-31, 2023. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:15 am
Defining Speedy Under California law, a misdemeanor criminal case must be tried within 45 days of charges for individuals who are not being incarcerated and just 30 days for anyone in custody. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The Joint Performance Review Committee agreed to turn the matters over to the ethics panel after Sen. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:04 pm
In 2018, you co-authored a law review article in which you argued for an entirely new liability framework once autonomous vehicles become the dominant mode of transport on our streets. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:48 am
Amidst these ongoing controversies, it becomes crucial to review the legal responsibilities of museums and the limits of the legislative framework regarding repatriation. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:41 am
In this episode of The Workplace podcast, CalChamber employment law experts Matthew Roberts and James Ward discuss the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling in Stericycle, Inc. and Teamsters Local 628, and how it affects California employers’ workplace rules and handbooks. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
