Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 208,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
"Application of AEDPA to Review of State Determinations of Fact (Wood v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Now the parents have refiled in state court, alleging causes of action that do not require a showing of state action. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
Supreme Court construed the Free Exercise Clause for the first time, holding in Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Jun 2005, 8:11 am
Since the 2002 US Supreme Court decsion in Troxel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court, in the case of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:48 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
Clay v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:01 am
United States’ Brief in Opposition United States v Denezpi Tenth Circuit Opinion [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
(Kyrene Justice Court No. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
Last week, the Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am
Brown is widely cited as one of the most significant decisions interpreting the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:32 pm
The case, Rousso v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
United States, a pro bono Fourth Amendment case that asks the Supreme Court to review whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies to changing law. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:26 am
United States. [read post]
