Search for: "DC Vote" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 11:08 am
The bill passed the House of Representatives in November on a vote of 389 to 15, but it has stalled in the Senate. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  After all, it was the Business Roundtable that challenged the SEC’s shareholder access rule and essentially helped generate an opinion from the DC Circuit that will bedevil rulemaking endeavors for years to come. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:03 am by Lawrence Higgins
The public will vote for their favorite products, similar to other contest such as American Idol. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:32 pm by Jeffrey Brown
Thus, it would seem that even if the surveillance did not involve physical trespass, five votes on the Supreme Court would find that a search occurred.This opinion changes precedent in three circuit courts insofar as they suggest that the use of a GPS device in tracking is not a search. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
 And it's also true that the enacted plan has not yet survived pre-clearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, pursuant to a separate proceeding in DC. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:05 am by Rick Hasen
When the Texas court issued its interim maps in the Texas redistricting case, it did not take into account how likely the Voting Rights Act challenges to those maps were likely to be. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Pildes
  The Court has held that the San Antonio court has to make the predictive judgment of whether there is a “reasonable probability” that the state’s plan will fail to gain preclearance in the other federal court – the preclearance court in DC. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Rick Hasen
  It should have started with the state’s plan, and then adjusted to the extent the plan violated the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 am by Richard Pildes
  But Texas already concedes — as it must — that the court cannot follow those plans if the court finds there is a substantial likelihood that the plans (or districts within them) would violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) or the Constitution. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:42 am by Gerard Magliocca
Those who oppose this bill, whether they intend it or not, by recording their votes against this enactment, reiterate the old dogma of tyrants, that the people are made to be governed and not to govern. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 The problem is that the White House won’t say whether the Justice Department was consulted and the current administration bypassed OLC on the constitutionality of DC voting rights legislation and overruled OLC on the nature of the military intervention in Libya. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:35 am by Zoe Tillman
District Court for the District of Columbia after the election; the court denied the injunction because early voting was already underway and the city was offering alternative absentee voting options. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Kali Borkoski
But that wasn’t good enough for DOJ, the plaintiffs, or the District Court because, apparently, many of the Hispanics in CD 23 aren’t voting often enough, or when they do, they’re voting for a Latino from the “wrong” party. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am by Aaron Tang
If the DC court denies pre-clearance, the San Antonio court will continue with its trial and will draw a fully compliant “remedial” map that would take effect for 2014 and become the new benchmark. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:15 am by Eric
Misleading the American public apparently is just business as usual in DC [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
There is a reason the state chose the slower and far more burdensome preclearance route, through the district court in DC. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:27 am by Aaron Tang
The DC District Court has neither heard evidence nor ruled on the VRA Section 5 compliance issues. [read post]