Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1661 - 1680 of 7,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
App’x. 202, 204-05 (11th Cir. 2010) (holding that a force majeure clause in a contract must be interpreted according to its plain and unambiguous meaning); Cartan Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
App’x. 202, 204-05 (11th Cir. 2010) (holding that a force majeure clause in a contract must be interpreted according to its plain and unambiguous meaning); Cartan Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
App’x. 202, 204-05 (11th Cir. 2010) (holding that a force majeure clause in a contract must be interpreted according to its plain and unambiguous meaning); Cartan Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:06 am by Mark Weidemaier
The problem with Lebanon’s FAA is that the CAC is weak but the bond does not appear to allow for the use of exit consents: Most of the details governing modification are found in Schedule I of the Lebanese FAA. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am by W. Burlette Carter
In January 2019, through little-noticed changes contained in House Resolution 6, the House amended Rule X(3)(i), which defined “special oversight functions” of the Oversight Committee. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
EPA somehow proves that Congress should re-authorize statutes every “x” number of years or else sunset them. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:00 am by Andrew Appel
This analysis applies to ballot-level comparison audits, but it does not apply to ballot polling audits. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 8:17 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Here’s the Senate Judiciary Committee’s press release (which, maddeningly, does not link to bill text, at least as of the time I wrote this). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I think a reasonable answer is yes, but how it matters is up for debate. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:56 pm by Chris Castle
 (Leave aside the absurdity that “Google can’t find [X]”.) [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Brand X Internet Services. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm by Evan Minton
The court also said that Dignity Health does not have a right to violate California’s nondiscrimination law. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 10:56 am by Dani Selby
Related: An Innocent Man Spent 20 Years in Prison for Malcolm X’s Murder 7. [read post]