Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:21 am
Finally, cases relied on by Tyson, such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, Thiessen v Gen Elec Corp, Espenscheid v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
The problem with barring those with conviction records, as explained by the United States Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:02 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Dukes , 131 S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
., v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Christie , Duke University School of Law The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Media groups have complained that this is a step to state control. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Popkin discusses this case in his insightful Duke Law Journal article on Stevens published in 1989.) [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
But unless you can get a class action certified — tricky, but possible, like in Dukes v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:22 am
Most recently, in Bramble v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:09 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 9:22 am
Times, et al v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:30 am
EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:47 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
