Search for: "Dept of Justice" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 3:13 am by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
  There is no doubt that winning the seat would be a tremendous victory for the respective government and an enormous economical boost for the respective country (see estimate as to the financial benefits for the hosting city/country) so that the seat issue is a perfect pledge and leverage for even more important negotiations such as the measures to take for stemming the European sovereign-dept crisis. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04234, Appellate Division, First Department Supreme Court, New York County denied the CPLR Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award which found that the New York City Department of Education had just cause to terminate the employee, Olga Batyreva. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
NERVOUS: Justice Dept. tries to cut Fast and Furious deal with Congress. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Jim Gerl
New York City Dept of Educ 779 F.Supp.2d 289, 56 IDELR 228 (E.D.N.Y. 4/25/2011). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:19 am by Sheldon Toplitt
" Forty years later, the Justice Department, a federal judge and a Texas academic are central figures in a document tussle that is bound further to illuminate the Watergate break-in and ensuing scandal that toppled the presidency of Richard Nixon.As reported by the Associated Press, Luke Nichter, a history professor at Texas A&M University-Central Texas who oversees a Website of cataloged covert Oval Office recordings made by President Nixon, submitted a Freedom of Information Act… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:56 am
A court order must be “clear and unequivocal” in order to hold a party in contempt for its alleged “failing to comply” Storman v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04217, Appellate Division, First Department Supreme Court granted, among other things, a motion to hold the New York City Department of Education (DOE) in contempt for its alleged failure to comply with a judgment. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by Associated Press
Justice Department says it will monitor elections in Wisconsin and three other states this week to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
From the New York Times: WASHINGTON — A judge’s declaration of a mistrial on Thursday in the John Edwards campaign finance case was a new setback for the Justice Department’s public integrity section, a once-vaunted watchdog that has been trying... [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:11 am by Mike Scarcella
Justice Department spokesperson was not immediately reached for comment. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
As reported by this blog [see "TUOL" post 6/24/11], Broome County Supreme Court Justice Phillip R. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:45 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, June 1, 2012: Ontario Appeal Court rules custody battle a U.S. issue after mom's California move when 7 months pregnant  John Edwards should not be retried (Washington Post) Judge Opposes Restrictions on Florida’s Voter Groups John Edwards trial jurors: ‘The evidence wasn’t there' Federal judge outlines Gulf oil spill trial Limiting severance obligations: not as easy as you may think Some… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Allowing this type of recovery would have, at best, negative and, at worst, devastating consequences for the criminal justice system. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:16 pm by Rick Hasen
MORE: Another High-Profile Failure for a Justice Dept. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:40 pm by Bill Araiza
 But in Olech the Court, in a short per curiam opinion joined in by all the justices except Justice Breyer, announced that individuals who suffered irrational discrimination could bring equal protection claims, even if they didn't claim discrimination based on a group characteristic. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Dept. of Justice, 150 F.Supp.2d 36, 41 (D.DC. 2001). [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:44 pm by Rick Hasen
If Justice Stevens saw fit to tie Bush v. [read post]