Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc."
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
This premise, though, would surely apply with equal force to any number of interlocutory rulings, such as why the court impaneled jurors who were challenged for cause, granted or denied a motion for summary judgment, allowed or disallowed particular discovery, exercised its gatekeeping function as it did with regard to a key expert witness, or admitted or excluded potentially dispositive evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
Nestle USA, Inc., the California Supreme Court issued guidance in determining when the statute of limitations runs on a claim for appropriation of likeness. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
S’holders Derivative Litig., 886 A.2d 1271, 1273 (Del. 2005) (citing Sugarland Industries Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 771, 739, 149 Cal.Rptr. 499; Caryl Richards Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Tile, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:58 pm
Pinstripe, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
DuncanBucknell can we leave the baggage of the industrial economy behind and instead focus on the benefits of IP in the knowledge economy? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:39 pm
SemBioSys Genetics Inc., out of Canada, was granted U.S. patent number 7,547, 821 entitled"Methods for the Production of Insulin in Plants". [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
Wayport, Inc., Del. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:49 am
"
International School Services Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:14 pm
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 2005 WL 2304190 (Sept. 20, 2005). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:43 am
"
International School Services Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 pm
" While Kret believes the biggest benefit of CMC has been allowing the Creative Discovery Museum and Hunter Museum to focus on their mission, the Hunter Museum has also improved productivity, generated additional income, and saved money. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:10 pm
Premier Parks, Inc., 2005 WL 468300 (Mar. 1, 2005), the Superior Court reconsiders its own discovery order after misapprehending just how difficult it is to find needles in haystacks of ESI. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
When a party claims that meeting a discovery request would cause an undue burden and excessive cost, courts now typically employ a balancing test to weigh the burden against the benefit. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:05 pm
Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 242 F.R.D. 362 (E.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
Merrrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U .S. 579 (1993). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:34 am
NW Airlines, Inc., 56 F.3d 313, 315 (1st Cir. 1995)). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
July 3, 2009 - Opinions ReleasedTEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDERS JUDGES TO EXPLAIN AND JUSTIFY WHY THEY GRANTED NEW TRIALS [in cases in which tort claim defendants had prevailed with the jury]"In the Interest of Justice" - a common label for judicial discretion in that regard and in others - will no longer pass muster as a sufficient ground. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:13 am
But patents for those discoveries have been awarded in just two countries, Australia and New Zealand. [read post]
