Search for: "District Court Nevada" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:02 am by Kit Case
The parties made a Joint Statment on November 13, 2012 announcing the Court’s approval: he United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Judge Robert N. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm by Zachary Price
NAMUDNO’s dicta Section 5 of the VRA requires covered states and local jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” from the Attorney General or a three-judge federal district court before changing certain election procedures, rules, or districts. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:16 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 13332 (D NV, Jan. 30, 2013), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
However, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion because (1) the Motion does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and the District of Nevada Local Rules; (2) Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate the existence of an emergency; and (3) Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that they will suffer irreparable harm should the Court deny their Motion. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 4:39 am by admin
States in this category include: Michigan Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Colombia Florida Georgia Idaho Iowa Kansas Kentucky Mississippi Minnesota Missouri Nevada New Mexico Courts in a very few states have split, and held that violation of a statute, but not an administrative regulation, constitutes negligence per se. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 9:09 am by Alexander J. Davie
Late last year, the United States District Court of Nevada handed down a ruling that has significant consequences for companies engaged in commerce on the internet.[1]  In the case, customers of online retailer Zappos.com sued the company seeking damages resulting from a security breach in which a hacker accessed Zappos’ customer information in 2012. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:47 am by Jon Brodkin
The lawsuit in US District Court in Montana (PDF) was filed against those four people as well as nine Nevada-based companies with names like American eVoice, Emerica Media, Foneright, and Voice Mail Professionals. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 6618 (D NV, Jan. 16, 2013), a Nevada federal district court allowed a Hebrew Israelite inmate to proceed with his equal protection challenge to a prison rule that limited kosher meals to inmates who obtained outside verification that they were Orthodox or Conservative Jews. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  But another, perhaps more intriguing option, is to do what the District of Columbia did. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:53 am by Matt DeVries
Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, the design contract included an indemnification provision where the design professionals agreed to indemnify the project owner for "any damages arising from any act, omission, or willful misconduct." [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:44 pm by Kevin Goldberg
  All of which puts the Aereo decision (from a District Judge in the Second Circuit) and the Aereokiller decision (from a District Judge in the Ninth Circuit) on course for a collision in the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 10:34 am by Matt Johnston
The Philadelphia District Attorney says yes. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  The Nevada Supreme Court recognized for the first time (although implicitly) that restrictive covenants may be enforceable against independent contractors. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  The Nevada Supreme Court recognized for the first time (although implicitly) that restrictive covenants may be enforceable against independent contractors. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant began the action for divorce in the Family Division, District Court, located in Clarke County, Nevada. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The high Court’s two leading Second Amendment cases—District of Columbia v. [read post]