Search for: "Doe Estates 1-10" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 4:03 am by Broc Romanek
These CDIs apply to the Rule 134 (ie. tombstone ad), Rule 165(c)(1)(ie. business combo) and Rule 433(c)(2)(i)(ie. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:15 am by Adrian J. Adams, Esq.
NOTE: just because an association is nonprofit does not mean it is tax exempt. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
  Every year, some Republican would introduce a bill to repeal the estate tax that year once and for all or, once that got to be very expensive, to change it to a 35% rate only applicable to amounts above $10 million. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by WSLL
Although Appellant claims the record contains “additional materials” supporting his claim, he does not specify the location or substance of such. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:33 am by Matthew Kahn, guest-blogging
  To a politician who does not believe in climate change science, this 10 times increase in premiums will look like simple “price gouging”. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by John Heckman
" If you primarily practice real estate, your answer might be "almost never. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:46 pm by rfording
  While the measure seems reasonable, like nearly every other local COL index it does not consider state and local taxes. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
In other words, in Ohio, if a commercial real estate lease with a ten (10) year stated term is not notarized, and payments are made monthly, only a month-to-month tenancy legally exists. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by EEM
Personally, I think knowing *who* UNHCR helps is essential for understanding what UNHCR does. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In objecting to the granting of a 40 percent density bonus, plaintiffs presented two main arguments: 1) section 65915 does not permit a 40 percent density bonus, and 2) the calculations of the density bonus were incorrect. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:32 am by Bruce E. Sands
After the 2008 real estate crash, Adam fell on hard times and failed to pay the 2008 ad valorem taxes due and payable on March 1, 2009. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:34 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
§ 521(a)(1)(B)(i):  “The debtor shall—file—  . . . a schedule of assets . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
However, the description of the settlement in the 10-Q does at least suggest some serious questions. [read post]