Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 10:10 am
“In conclusion,” Judge Robinson explained that while the licensees “have retained (or have been granted back) certain rights in the patents-in-suit, the court does not deem such rights ‘substantial’ vis a vis those held by MMI. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm
Is the real-world situation vis-à-vis the federal deficit more like a prisoner’s dilemma or a coordination game? [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The applicant applied for restitution of rights pursuant to A 122.The RS refused restitution of rights on the single ground that A 122 provides only for restoration of rights where there has been failure to observe a time limit which it is for the applicant to observe, whereas the time limit not observed in the present case was one which it was for the UKPO to observe.The Board agrees with the RS:[2] While it is clear that the appellant and its representative were in no way responsible for what has… [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 4:38 pm
The Richard judgment does undoubtedly expand the ambit of individuals’ privacy rights vis-à-vis criminal investigations, but it is unlikely to set the dangerous precedent for journalism that many in the media have expressed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:36 pm
Thus, it is well worth watching what the Court does in this case in the coming months. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Not only does this bias lead to inaccurate predictions for patients, but it also creates negative feedback loops, Hoffman and Podgurski contend. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
Does anyone understand this differently? [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
The Board noted that the existence of these registrations does not evidence use, nor does it establish the public's familiarity with the marks. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This party has not disputed the finding of the OD that document D2 does not mention at all DCs in gel or other water containing forms and that documents D4 and D5 are totally silent as to the nature of the materials that could be used for packaging or containing gel DCs during storage. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am
Regrettably the page was taken off line as part of Jones’ legal offensive against the criticism (does Facebook not allow parody pages?) [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
: On the approach to be taken by the federal government vis-à-vis the states. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:19 am
Repayment of this loan, plus interest, accrues to New York employers through the Federal Unemployment Tax Act vis-à-vis the calculation of future contribution rates. [read post]
26 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
"As to the second argument, Bose contended that this case should be treated exactly like In re Honeywell, Inc., 8 USPQ2d 1600 (TTAB 1988), in which the Board refused to apply claim preclusion vis-a-vis Honeywell's circular thermostat design due to what had "happened in the marketplace" in the seventeen years after registration was refused. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:32 am
However, the record does not reveal whether viewers of the image of an otherwise unclothed Ms. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Nor does it apply to nanoparticulates in liquid state [nanoemulsions], "unless encapsulated in a solid or gel shell. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:10 am
We have to start our evaluation of the position that Duke authors would be in, vis-à-vis these publishers, by asking ourselves what exactly the Duke Open Access policy is. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:56 am
The legislative process takes time, and employers should be using that head start to their advantage so that they are prepared to correctly handle hiring, firing, and other employment related decisions vis-à-vis victims of sexual harassment if A.B. 171 becomes law. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
For his part, Judge Pohl denies having any position at all vis a vis the accused. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
We have privacy rights in our person, but the existence of those rights does not depend on us being cloaked from the law entirely. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:38 am
" Going back to the question in the post title, does this Tribunal think that authorized trade retaliation can violate investment law provisions? [read post]
