Search for: "FIRST MERIT" Results 1661 - 1680 of 32,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 9:27 am by Nathan Salminen
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit overturned the lower court’s holding that Facebook “likes” are too insubstantial to merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:49 am
When third years billing over 2200 hours are being paid $5,000 more than first years, something's not right. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Andrew
  Burgess first argued that she suffered racial discrimination when her position was terminated and when a less qualified white woman was selected for the new position created in its place. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The post Tuesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
The post Tuesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
For a non-spoliating party, you can surely ask for the ultimate sanction but know that the court will make all efforts to fashion a remedy that punishes the spoliating party and still allows the case to be decided on the merits. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The argument will be followed by a ruling on the merits, potentially influencing farm-irrigation operations on the Plains. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:52 am by lawmrh
By and large, judges and many lawyers prefer a merit selection and retention system and not the rough and tumble of election campaigns. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Corina Heri
In yesterday’s judgment, the Court set out extensive findings on the admissibility, merits, and reparations aspects of the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Martinez and First Amendment Jurisprudence, (11 First Amendment Law Review 235-89 (2012)).Matthew B. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am by Eileen McDermott
In its ruling in 2020, the Ninth Circuit said VIP’s dog toy mimicking a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection, reversing the district court’s initial holding that the toy infringed and diluted Jack Daniel’s marks and remanding the case back to the district court for a determination on the merits of the infringement claim. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The court went on, however, to conclude that plaintiff had not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of those claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:51 am by Daniel Shaviro
I am flying today to Portland, OR (not ME), where tomorrow, at Reed College, I will give a talk concerning my book project on literature and high-end inequality, as described here.The book, entitled Dangerous Grandiosity: Literary Perspectives on High-End Inequality Through the First Gilded Age, should be appearing in print and as an e-book, perhaps as soon as the first half of 2020. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am by Eileen McDermott
In its ruling in 2020, the Ninth Circuit said VIP’s dog toy mimicking a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection, reversing the district court’s initial holding that the toy infringed and diluted Jack Daniel’s marks and remanding the case back to the district court for a determination on the merits of the infringement claim. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm by Daily Record Staff
Because of our disposition of Cooper’s convictions on that ground alone, we need not address the merits of his second challenge. [read post]