Search for: "Farmer v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm by Rick
Wells and Margaret Atwood, as Nancy Farmer and Franz Kafka. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm by Roger Parloff
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
This new section on infill projects will not apply until the state has developed infill guidelines. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
  Many of the tests were conducted in response to complaints primarily from farmers about the effects the emissions had on certain particularly sensitive crops and trees. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Santiago Stocker
The vanishing of grazing routes in much of the region, due in large part to population growth and increased farming, has drawn these pastoralists into conflict with farmers, with violence increasingly playing out along sectarian lines. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
The reason you're limited to the State of Arizona exemptions (and a couple of others) is that Arizona is what's called an "opt-out" state, because it did. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
You could have subpoenas seeking all of Jimmy Carter’s financial history simply because he was a peanut farmer and they want a case study on agriculture. [read post]