Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1661 - 1680 of 13,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 1:26 pm
Nintendo is sure to argue that the independent claims read on any motion sensor system, and Nintendo was not the first to use such a system (although Nintendo was arguably the first to "successfully" incorporate such a system into a popular game console, which is why they are being sued).Here is a representative figure from the patent:The case is Motiva, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am by INFORRM
Since PJS, and now also since Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, a new path appears to be being forged for privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:41 am
  Perhaps federal sentencing practitioners both inside and outside the Sixth Circuit can help me figure this out. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
“Something more” must be required to lose immunity under the 512(c)(1)(B), it concluded; but it could not determine exactly what it was, and remanded to the district court to figure it out. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:06 am by MaxVal
The V-ROVER is one of the access node communications devices that makes up the access network layer (ANL). [read post]