Search for: "Fisher v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany,  heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
However, Boucher's waiving his Miranda rights was a Pandora's box that led the trial judge to order compliance with the subpoena, proclaiming:  "Where the existence and location of the documents are known to the government, 'no constitutional rights are touched,' because these matters are a 'foregone conclusion.' Fisher [v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
And the Supreme Court’s decision (by granting cert to Fisher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  According to King, Van Houten refused to meet on a regular basis, proclaimed himself to be a "cowboy" and stated that he would "just get it done". [read post]