Search for: "Goldman v Goldman" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2024, 3:06 am by Will Yeatman
Meta Platforms, the Ninth Circuit “does more damage to Section 230,” writes Eric Goldman of the Technology & Marketing Blog. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
News Article: LINKEric Goldman's Blog Article: LINK1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:46 pm by Larry Ribstein
Trust, Federal Misgovernance of Mutual Funds, and Senate testimony on the Goldman case. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-02-20 https://t.co/VQd2bevZTv 2018-02-21 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-02-20 https://t.co/PhGoSAAUaX 2018-02-21 Kodi box add-on distributor loses copyright appeal: Bell v Adam Lackman dba https://t.co/sFLBOAkgbJ https://t.co/IMd8Yyow4m 2018-02-21 Kodi box add-on distributor loses copyright appeal: Bell v Adam Lackman dba https://t.co/sFLBOAkgbJ https://t.co/4q2AqqtYe6 2018-02-21 The internet has given us amazing new… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
  And in his column for the Blue Ridge News, Lee Goldman predicts that when the Court does rule in King, it will rule in favor of the challengers and strike down the subsidies. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a ruling issued today in the case known as Barnes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:11 pm by Venkat
The California Court of Appeal recently issued a blockbuster of a decision in Hypertouch v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Sacco defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal [*2]malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, LLC, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 652; Atiencia v Pinczewski, 148 AD3d 860, 861). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, a cause of action for legal malpractice based upon alleged misconduct occurring during the attorney's representation of the plaintiff is not duplicative of a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty based upon alleged misconduct occurring after the termination of the representation (see Country Club Partners, LLC v Goldman, 79 AD3d 1389, 1391; Kurman v Schnapp, 73 AD3d 435, 435-436). [read post]