Search for: "Havens v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
In Canada, courts haven't cited Wikipedia that frequently, but it is happening more and more. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
Staub v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:44 am
It is contended that tribunal posts are not to be treated like post retirement havens for former civil servants. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:19 pm
In case the National Labor Relations Board’s recent decisions and the Federal Trade Commission’s new proposed rule on non-competes haven’t given employers enough to think about in the new year, companies with federal contracts or subcontracts may soon be faced with significantly more burdensome audits from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) as well. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:51 am
Before I share the latest information regarding Ericsson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Carmichael, Stokely and Charles V. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
In dismissing this claim, the district court stated that "[a]lthough the Second Circuit has not ruled on whether a private right of action exists under Title IX for claims of employment discrimination, '[a]n overwhelming majority of district courts in this Circuit have found that an implied private right of action does not exist[] under Title IX for employees alleging gender discrimination in the terms and conditions of their employment.'" The Court of Appeals… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
(Counsel in black robes preparing for Supreme Court oral argument - with apologies to the IPKat)All eyes will be on the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) on Monday, October 29, 2012 when it will hear oral argument in the immensely important case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
In Winter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
Earlier this month, in the case of Hudnell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
In Shotts v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:26 am
When the Supremes decided in Maryland v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:18 am
Supreme Court handed down its first-ever international family law opinion today in Abbott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in MGM v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
