Search for: "Holm v. Holm" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Full report: Bailii.WBC v CP & Ors [2012] EWHC 1944 (Costs) (12 July 2012)Application for costs following Court of Protection and Administrative Court proceedings. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Shor, No. 07-2334 A sentence for conspiracy to distribute ecstasy is affirmed where the district court correctly calculated his sentence in adding a criminal history point pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4A1.1(c) based on defendant's prior sentence for an assault with a dangerous weapon that resulted in a two-year probationary sentence imposed under Michigan's Holmes Youthful Trainee Act. . [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the first, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
It probably explains the continued soundness of Justice Holmes' statement that "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
We experienced perfect storms of risk during the SPAC boom with frauds like the one that the SEC alleges was perpetrated by Trevor Milton and the EV company, Nikola.[6] And we’ve seen them in any number of recent alleged frauds by founders, including the collapse of Theranos and the prosecutions of its founders Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani.[7] I am certain that those who have studied these and other recent financial frauds at greater length than me, or than my remarks allow… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The article complained of had said that Neumann “defrauded” investors in We Work and likened him to convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]