Search for: "House v. House"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 41,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:43 am
Lonsdale (t/a Lonsdale Agencies) (Appellant) v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 4:46 am
Birmingham City Council (Appellants) v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:31 pm
Awful title due to NL himself.Mew v Tristmire concerned whether or not two “houseboats” were “dwelling houses let as separate dwellings” as required in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988 in order for them to be assured tenancies.The “houseboats” appear to have been converted WWII landing craft that were, in the event, not used in the D-Day invasion. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:31 pm
Awful title due to NL himself.Mew v Tristmire concerned whether or not two “houseboats” were “dwelling houses let as separate dwellings” as required in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988 in order for them to be assured tenancies.The “houseboats” appear to have been converted WWII landing craft that were, in the event, not used in the D-Day invasion. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:08 pm
Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough [2007] EWCA Civ 1087. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 11:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
CA9: Stop suppressed as based on a hunch and represented at suppression hearing as a mere conclusion
18 May 2012, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm
This was strongly suggested in various White House comments over the last few weeks, but it's nice to see something official. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:53 pm
NOT CHARGED – Possession of Marijuana and Possession of Dangerous Drugs for Sale, State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
Roeschlein v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 am
RB (Algeria) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department OO (Jordan) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) [2009] UKHL 10 (18 February 2009) Mitchell (AP) and another (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Glasgow City Council (Original Appellant and Cross-respondents) (Scotland) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:27 am
R v Briggs-Price (Appellant) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2009] UKHL 19 (29 April 2009) R v JTB (Appellant) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2009] UKHL 20 (29 April 2009) Gomes (Appellant) v Government of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondents) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice); Goodyer [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:44 am
R (on the application of Gentle (FC) and another (FC)) (Appellants) v The Prime Minister and others (Respondents) [2008] UKHL 20 (9 April 2008) McGrath and another (Appellants) and others v Riddell and others (Respondents) McGrath and another and others (Appellants) v Riddell and others (Respondents) (Conjoined Appeals) [2008] UKHL 21 (9 April 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:11 am
Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another) R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) v James (FC) (Appellant) (formerly Walker and another); R (on the application of Lee) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) and one other action Secretary [...] [read post]
